Archive for marzo, 2011
referendum 12 e 13 giugno: come si vota se si risiede all’estero
Votare per i referendum giugno 2011 dall’estero.
Le elettrici e gli elettori italiani residenti all’estero possono votare per questi referendum. Il voto avviene tramite posta.
Per votare all’estero occorre essere iscritti all’AIRE (l’anagrafe della popolazione italiana residente all’estero)
Se sei un’elettrice o un elettore residente all’estero (iscritto all’AIRE) riceverai a domicilio, da parte del Consolato, il plico elettorale contenente le schede e le istruzioni sulle modalità di voto. Segui attentamente le istruzioni e ricorda di osservare le date indicate per spedire all’Ufficio consolare la busta preaffrancata contenente la busta anonima con le schede votate.
La busta con le schede va rispedita al Consolato entro e non oltre le ore 16 di giovedì 18 giugno (ma sarebbe bene chiamare il Consolato italiano del Paese ove si risiede per certezza).
Se non ricevi il plico elettorale, potrai recarti di persona al Consolato per verificare la tua posizione elettorale: se il tuo nominativo già figura nell’elenco degli elettori in possesso dell’Ufficio consolare potrai ottenere un duplicato del plico elettorale, mentre in caso contrario potrai chiedere al Consolato di attivare le procedure per essere aggiunto all’elenco degli elettori.
Meglio quindi essere prudenti, e accertare la propria posizione adesso!
Due SI per dire no alla privatizzazione dell’acqua pubblica, un SI contro il Nucleare, un SI contro il legittimo impedimento. Si vota il 12 e 13 Giugno 2011
i quattro quesiti dei prossimi referendum
Ai referendum del 12 giugno per dire NO devi segnare SI.
Vuoi eliminare il ricorso all’energia nucleare? SI.
Vuoi cancellare la privatizzazione dell’acqua? SI.
Vuoi sbarazzarti del legittimo impedimento? SI.
Il 2 aprile Giornata nazionale di mobilitazione contro la guerra – L’Appello e le adesioni
APPELLO COORDINAMENTO 2 APRILE
Berlusconi fabrica la realidad en Lampedusa de Miguel Mora
el pais.com
El primer ministro, de visita en la isla, usa la crisis migratoria para lanzar promesas fantasiosas y cubrir la emboscada parlamentaria que le salvará de dos de sus procesos
Fue una jornada triste para Italia, para la democracia, para Europa. Por eso no cabe en esta crónica la impresionante serenidad y dignidad de los casi 4.000 jóvenes tunecinos que anoche paseaban o dormían al raso en el muelle de Lampedusa, entre detritus y policías. La policía ha confirmado que ayer murieron seis personas en el naufragio de una patera. Once personas han sobrevivido y han llegado a la isla. El limpio anhelo de libertad de Ben Hassan, Nizer, Jahmed, Fethi merece un espacio aparte.
Minacce a Lampedusa a chi vuole contestare Berlusconi: “Vi ammazziamo come cani”
Un fatto gravissimo ieri a Lampedusa. Un tizio minaccia alcuni ragazzi che al comizio di Berlusconi tentano di aprire uno striscione con su scritto “Berlusconi fora de ball, nessuna accoglienza per il principale responsabile di questa indecenza”. Le parole dell’uomo: “Buttate questi cartelli… Queste telecamere ve le facciamo mangiare…” E ancora l’uomo sfida un manifestante: “Qui ci ammazziamo come i cani, lo giuro”. Ecco come reprimono chi contesta il raìs. Non lasciamo soli questi ragazzi, diffondiamo e denunciamo. Ecco il video testimonianza
Lampedusa, minacce fasciste (dal blog de L’espresso)
E’ un ristoratore di estrema destra l’uomo che, davanti ai poliziotti, ha cercato di intimidire i manifestanti contro Berlusconi: «Buttate questi cartelli o qui ci ammazziamo come cani». E’ un estremista di destra l’uomo che, davanti ai poliziotti, ha minacciato i concittadini che volevano manifestare contro Berlusconi. Già in passato è stato al centro di episodi violenti ed è conosciuto sull’isola per le sue simpatie fasciste. (Umberto Lucentini)
From the West nothing new: the war! by Alessandra Mecozzi
The bombing raids on Libya, with their predictable “side effects” in terms of civilian casualties, leave no doubts as to whether military intervention in Libya.
Once again, with tragic hypocrisy, the humanitarian rhetoric is used to cover a new war imposed by the West against the population of an Arab country, Libya. And we see more explicit the opposition to this action by the Arab League, African Union and now in Turkey!.
Although for weeks at a popular uprising, initially unarmed, in the wake of what happened in Tunisia and Egypt, Gaddafi’s government has responded with bombings and massacres, the international community has remained motionless.
UN Resolution 1973 which formally places first the cease-fire and the defense of the civilian population is not only late, but ambiguous, and paved the way for an operation of war under the pressure of governments like France and Britain, interested in gaining a presence in , and the United States, apparently more cautious, having already failed the experience of Iraq and Afghanistan and seeing a revolt also in the Middle East.
Blindly and irrationally, the Italian government, dropped from the league, fearing the ‘invasion’ of refugees, but supported by the opposition, embarks on an adventure war, after having for years comes to the Government of Gaddafi – now loathed dictator – Treats, business and large quantities of weapons.
Waving the banner of human rights of the Libyan population, through military action, which inevitably, given the nature of armed conflict in progress, are outstripping the only no fly zone, while the human rights of thousands of migrants are trumpled on, since many days on the island of Lampedusa,- and even before by the Libyan government on request of the Italian one,- is grotesque and offensive, first to the people of that island, now also exposed to fear of possible reprisals from Libya, and throughout our country.
The march of the Arab “revolutions of dignity”, in search of democracy, freedom and social justice, a great hope of the world, would have earned and deserve from Europe and the international community as a whole, a very different focus, and intelligent support initiative in order to advance, while making the necessary distinctions between different realities. Libya is not either Tunisia or Egypt and the uprising was quickly mixed, taking up arms, in a power struggle inside the regime. This does not alter the character of despotic and repressive regime of Gaddafi, and the need for freedom of that population, but must be considered.
Of the necessary attention, resulting in a predictive capacity, to what is happening in the entire Mediterranean and Middle East, there are no tracks, while the insurgency is spreading. The project of “Greater Middle East” under U.S. control, and allied Arab regimes, at the time launched by Bush, was defeated. . The same Obama’s speech in Cairo open and respectful of the peoples of Islam, it was a sign.
But an alternative to that design can be born, if there is the chance to make a path for the construction of democracy and social justice by the people throughout the area, which today are creating the conditions, and that in the first place Europe should be able and willing to support.
The popular uprisings in these hours are bloodily repressed in Middle Eastern countries, including through the deployment of troops from other countries, like Saudi Arabia to Bahrain, which raised no outraged reaction, and also the ones inYemen, Syria, could be permanently cut short. The demonstrations of Palestinian youth in Gaza and the occupied territories, claiming freedom, unity, democracy, also repressed, are not mentioned either. On behalf of the unbreakable alliance with Israel, the West for decades, has been passing over its massacres, crimes of war, the ongoing violation of human rights and international law ..
We can expect that the “military solution” to the conflict in Libya in support of Western interests, is a bad example for countries such as Tunisia and Egypt, where they have started peacefully, although paying a price in blood, a participatory people’s process towards democracy and decent living conditions, yet fragile and exposed to backlash. The international community, while preaching democracy and human rights, allows different governments, driven by appetites of gas and petroleum, to take weapons, which are the opposite of democracy and justice.
Could have been done differently? Yes, the instrumentation and the diplomatic and political initiative, along with the humanitarian, could – and still hope that we can to avoid a disastrous escalation – To give a different course of action to the international community. Currently there has not even tried, indeed there is a fight about “who’s leading…”.
Tap, once again, to those who have no power, the movement for peace, social justice and environment, to those who are against war and militarism, who work near the migrants and against racism, to denounce hypocrisy of the unlimited humanitarian rhetoric which again fuels the war, to watch carefully and support the arduous journey of the Arab population, to reclaim dignity and hospitality for migrants, to oppose the war.
22 of march 2001
(*) Alessandra Mecozz, International Secretary Fiom-Cgil, Esf/Wsf Italian coordination
“Indignarsi non basta”, Il dubbio e la passione di Ingrao
Ricordo di essermi posto, con il
lutto nel cuore, la domanda secca “che faccio io?”.
Fonte : Pietro Ingrao – il Fatto
retebellaciaoinmovimento.wordpress 